Supreme Court denies request by student group to host drag show at West Texas A&M University

Supreme Court denies request by student group to host drag show at West Texas A&M University - Crime and Courts - News

Supreme Court Declines Request for Campus Drag Show, Upholding Ban by West Texas A&M University
performance will not take place while litigation continues.”>

Supreme Court Denies Request for Campus Drag Show by West Texas A&M University Student Group

In a significant decision, the United States Supreme Court has declined to intervene in a dispute between Spectrum WT, an LGBTQ student group at West Texas A&M University (WTAMU), and the university administration over the prohibition of a drag show on campus. The order issued by the Court does not settle the matter but implies that the performance will remain banned while the litigation proceeds.

Background and Legal History

Spectrum WT, along with two student leaders of the LGBTQ group, filed an emergency petition with the Supreme Court on March 10, 2023, seeking to reverse WTAMU’s decision to prohibit their planned drag show. The students argued that the ban violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and expression.

Previous Developments in the Case

The legal proceedings began in April 2022, when Spectrum WT initially sought to hold the drag show on campus. The university administration rejected their request, citing concerns about potential disruptions and the possibility of conflicting viewpoints. Following the denial, Spectrum WT announced that they would hold the performance off campus.

Ongoing Litigation and Future Prospects

The case has been pending for nearly a year, with the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals set to hear oral arguments on April 27, 2023. Despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision not to intervene, the issue remains under active review by the appellate court.

Implications of the Supreme Court’s Decision

The Supreme Court’s denial of Spectrum WT’s petition leaves the future of their drag show uncertain. While the decision does not resolve the legal question regarding the constitutionality of the ban, it serves as a reminder that the Supreme Court may be reluctant to intervene in ongoing campus disputes. As the case progresses through the appellate courts, both sides will continue to advocate for their respective positions.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Spectrum WT’s emergency petition marks a setback for the LGBTQ student group seeking to hold a drag show on campus at West Texas A&M University. The ongoing litigation will continue in the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, with both sides advocating their positions on the constitutionality of the ban.

Sources